Pastor Kerry here: Amanda Udis-Kessler is a friend and colleague of mine. She shared this sermon with me, and I asked if I might post it on my sermon blog. She obliged. I give you (with occasional emphatic formatting by me):
The Promise of All
Lives Mattering
by Amanda
Udis-Kessler, Flame of Life Universalists, Pueblo, CO February 8, 2015
Dr. Udis-Kessler can be reached for comments or questions at audiskessler at coloradocollege dot ee dee u
I
spent part of my last birthday protesting police violence against African
Americans. It was a rewarding experience, though I think the weather gods ought
to be nicer about the temperature when people are outdoors holding signs for an
hour on their birthdays. Perhaps that’s too much to expect for December. But
the protest was going well, with intermittent bursts of the chant “Black lives
matter”, when suddenly a bunch of white participants started chanting “All
lives matter! All lives matter!” I caught the eye of the protest organizer, an
African American woman. She looked disgusted.
I’d
forgotten about this moment until a few weeks later when I was in a meeting
with the Social Justice Team at my church and we were discussing the protest. Someone
who had not attended said, “I don’t understand why we can’t say ‘All Lives
Matter.’ We believe in the inherent worth and dignity of all people, not just
black people. So we believe that all lives matter. Shouldn’t we say that?”
Why
should we say “black lives matter” anyway? This is a great question, and I’ll
try to answer it today. I’ll start by drawing a distinction between a faith
stance and a description of reality, move on to the question of what we mean by
lives that matter and how we can tell that someone’s life matters, and then
provide extensive evidence that, in fact, black lives don’t matter all that
much in the United States today and never have. We’ll end with that most
important of questions, what can we do?
And
let’s be clear about one thing: I expect that we all have the best possible
intentions when it comes to affirming the inherent worth and dignity of all
people. The whites in the protest who started chanting “All lives matter” were liberal
white activists, not members of the Klan. My acquaintance on the Social Justice
Team is passionately concerned about the well-being of poor people, who often
include people of color. There are no accusations here today, just an
examination of some painful realities. We may be uncomfortable with this topic;
I know I am. But until we understand racism as something that has very little
to do with intentions, we won’t be able to do much about it. So let’s jump in.
To
get at the difference between saying “all lives matter” and “black lives
matter” we first need to understand the distinction between an affirmation of
faith and a description of reality. When we say “all lives matter”, are we making
a statement about what we believe based on, for example, the First Principle
affirming the inherent worth and dignity of all people, or are we saying that
reality demonstrates that all people are treated as though they matter? The
protestors chanting “all lives matter” were at the protest because they found
police brutality against African Americans morally unacceptable. They were well
aware that black lives are not as important as white lives in this society. But
I think they ached for a society in which all lives mattered, and mattered
equally. And so they were chanting their belief, their claim, their trust that,
contrary to all visible evidence, all lives do matter, or at least that in the
world we want to live in all lives will matter. I think we can all agree with
that. But it doesn’t go far enough.
Here’s
the problem: there’s something in the claim that all lives matter that smacks
of colorblindness, a common liberal stance and for many a goal for our society.
Colorblindness is often well-intentioned, an attempt to see everyone as a human
being and therefore the same without paying too much attention to the
extraneous stuff like race. We imagine that Dr. King envisioned a color-blind
future in his hope that his four children would eventually be judged based on
the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
Colorblindness,
however, misses the fullest reality of who we are as people. We are each
individuals, with our own set of life experiences and our own particular ways
of making sense of those experiences. We are all human beings, sharing certain
common needs and able to offer certain common blessings to each other. So far,
so good. Our individuality seems to point back to King’s comment about the
content of our character, which sounds like an individual matter. Our
commonality as human beings seems to fit the assumptions of colorblindness,
which have a lot to do with all people being the same.
But
what’s still missing here, and crucially important, is that we are not merely
individuals and we are not merely human beings; we are members of social
groups, groups that get valued differently from one another and treated
differently from each other and thus have group experiences that differ in
patterned ways. Men, for example, are paid more than women on average for the
same work and women are much more likely to be raped than men. Heterosexuals can
get legally married in all 50 states and rarely get gaybashed unless they are
mistaken for gay. And African Americans are treated less well than whites in
many walks of life, not least by the police, precisely because they are still
judged by the color of their skin.
Colorblindness
has no way to address the reality that our group identities lead to different
treatment. In fact, as UU Alex Kapitan blogged recently, it’s worse than that.
If society is colorblind then any difficulties I face are my own fault since we
are all individuals and only individuals. All those women getting raped, they must
have asked for it. All that violence against sexual minorities wouldn’t happen
if they didn’t flaunt it. And African Americans wouldn’t keep getting shot if
they weren’t hoodie-wearing thugs. Colorblindness is, among other things, a way
to blame the victim. Once we reject colorblindness as an accurate description
of society, we can start talking realistically about the evidence that black
lives don’t matter too much in the US and then do more about it than we have
yet done.
So,
what does it mean to matter? How do you know you matter? Here are a few
examples: People take you seriously. They believe you when you talk about your
experiences. They treat you as the expert on your own life. They expect good
things of you. They support your well-being and want you to flourish. You have
access to high-quality schools, safe neighborhoods, all the things you need to
make a life that matters, that is full of joy, that gives back to others. You
know that you are valued by others, and valuable to them.
Beyond
these examples, how do you know your life matters, that others cherish your very
existence and want it to continue? Here are the two answers that seem to me
most important: you have access to all the basic survival resources you need,
and you are not in danger of being physically harmed or killed. You can breathe
clean air, drink clean water, and eat healthy food. You have a warm place to
live. You have access to good, affordable healthcare. You live in a
neighborhood with little or no violent crime. No one is looking to beat you up
because you disgust them. People will interact with you in ways that look out
for your safety if at all possible.
So
if I were a black person surveying the scene in the US today, would I see
evidence that I matter, that my perspective matters, that my flourishing
matters? What about my life mattering? Based on a lot of reading and
conversations, here’s what I think I would know were I a black person in the US
today. Be warned: if you’re not already familiar with this information the next
few minutes may be tough.
As
a black person I am less likely to be shown apartments and homes in certain
neighborhoods than a white person would be and more likely to be offered the
highest-risk, highest-cost type of mortgage. I’m more likely to live in a
segregated neighborhood with poorer housing stock, failing schools, inadequate
municipal services, lower-quality food in the stores, fewer banks made up for
by expensive check-cashing outfits, less information about potential
high-paying jobs, more concentrated poverty, and more violence. And there’s not
too much I can do to change this. My house is worth less than a house in a
white suburb, so I’m accruing less home equity and the property tax base can’t
pay for a well-funded school.
As
a black person I hear that Jews are never to forget the Holocaust, that
Americans are never to forget Pearl Harbor and 9/11, but that I’m just playing
the race card or acting like a victim if I bring up slavery, lynching, the
failure of Reconstruction, Jim Crow, the violent repression of voting rights in
the South in the 1960s, or today’s mass incarceration of people of color.
As
a black person, if I send in a resume for a job, I’m only half as likely as an
equally qualified white person to receive a callback or job offer. A white
person just released from prison has as good a chance as I do to get the job even
if I have no criminal record. I need more education than a white person to
receive equal consideration for the same job in many cases.
As
a black person I was probably quoted a higher price for the last car I bought
than a white person would have been quoted.
As
a black person I know that a number of states are trying to restrict my voting
rights and the Supreme Court is letting them get away with it.
As
a black person I may know that South Central Los Angeles has one primary care
physician for every 13 thousand residents; the nearby white town Bel Air has
one for every 214 residents. Southeast Washington, DC has one pediatrician for
every 3700 children while nearby white Bethesda has one for every 400. If I go
to the doctor I may well be given less pain treatment than a white person would
be, and if I have a heart attack I’m less likely than a white person to receive
best-practice care.
As
a black man, even being upper-middle class and teaching or studying at a
prestigious university is no protection against police suspicion toward me and
mistreatment of me, or against white assumptions that I’m a criminal. I can be
a television producer and still be made to sit on the curb, handcuffed, in my
expensive suit, because I’m bald and some bald black guy just did something
illegal. A trip to a department store is likely to result in my being followed
by security. Regardless of my gender, a trip to an expensive jewelry or clothing
store may result in my simply not being let in at all since it’s presumed I
can’t possibly afford to shop there.
As
a black male I’m more likely than a white male to be stopped by the police
because I “fit the description” of a criminal, regardless of how I’m behaving. I’m
more likely to be arrested, charged, and convicted than a white male, and if
convicted I’ll face a longer prison sentence for the same crime. If I live in
Colorado Springs I’m more than three times as likely to be arrested as a non-black
person. If I live in Albuquerque I’m more than twice as likely. If I were born
in 2001, I have a one-in-three chance of being incarcerated at some point in my
life, up to six times the chance a white male born the same year has.
As
a black person I know that if I were white I could do all sorts of illegal
things, from underage drinking to aggravated assault to felony theft to
possession and sale of narcotics, to participating in a riot, without
necessarily paying much or any penalty for it but as a black person, carrying
out petty theft or selling loose cigarettes in the street, or doing absolutely
nothing illegal at all, is enough to get me killed by police. White people can
open carry and not get shot, point guns at police officers and not get shot,
and shoot up a movie theater, killing 12 and wounding 70 others, and somehow be
taken alive by police. In contrast I can be twelve years old and be holding a
toy gun in a park and be shot to death by police within two seconds of their
arrival.
As
a black person I recall Ella Baker’s comment in the Civil Rights movement about
the killing of black men, black mother’s sons, not being as important to white
society as the killing of white men, white mother’s sons. And I know this is
still true. So I teach my children, especially the boys, exactly how to behave
in case of an encounter with the police, who are more likely to shoot them than
they would be if my boys were white. And I have to tell them they can’t assume
that the police are on their side. Doing this is utterly heartbreaking but the
alternative is worse. If I have a son and he spends any time on the highway or
in white areas, I know the odds are incredibly high that he will have a run-in
with the police eventually no matter how innocent, well-dressed, or wealthy he
is, and I can only hope that he will survive with no physical injuries.
If
I’m a black male shot to death by a police officer for whatever reason, the
media will describe me more negatively than they describe white mass murderers,
including the Aurora theater killer, Ted Bundy, and Elliott Rodger.
That’s
the world I would see if I were a black person in America today. Yes, that is a
long, disturbing, infuriating, depressing description. Those of us who are
white mostly have the luxury of ignoring these realities, but black people
don’t. And over and over, the message is hammered into their heads: You don’t
matter. Your well-being doesn’t matter. Your life doesn’t matter. We white
people don’t really care much how well you do in life or even whether you live.
Now, again, I don’t think the white people in this room feel this way. We absolutely
affirm the inherent worth and dignity of all people. We really do want all
people to flourish. But until we acknowledge the realities above, our
effectiveness as change agents of flourishing is limited.
What
can we do about this? First, I think we must be willing to be uncomfortable,
something you all just did a great job with for the past few minutes. Thank you
for that, by the way. Then we have to make a commitment to this particular
arena of justice, not to the exclusion of other justice struggles but as an
important place to live on the side of love. Once we know that blacks are
treated as though their lives don’t matter as much as white lives, we can focus
on changing the equation. We white people can be part of the struggle to make
black lives matter more, though we can never be at the center of it.
Here’s
what we who are white can do: we can educate ourselves about black history and
present-day reality, through reading and other forms of learning. We can be in
solidarity with people of color and believe them when they tell us what their
lives are like. We can donate money to organizations that support black
flourishing. We can write letters to the editor that get people thinking. We
can vote for politicians who acknowledge racial inequality and are committed to
doing something about it. We can join organizations that address these issues,
and we can develop church projects along these lines. We can educate other
white people about the realities of racism and the opportunities of justice. Anything
we do that invites more whites to be part of the solution rather than keeping a
privileged distance is an act of living on the side of love.
My
friends, if you are already doing this work, may you be blessed in it. If you
are ready to do it, may patience and courage be yours. And may we all be part
of the building of a future in which, when we say all lives matter, we are
describing reality and not just making a faith statement.
Amen and blessed be.
Dear Amanda, As I already e-mailed you, I enjoyed this sermon very much and thanks for giving me the reference to it as I would like to share with some friends.
ReplyDeleteI would like to add just one other suggestion among those that you provided in this excellent piece. It was an action introduced to me during an affirmative action training session when I was a librarian at Iowa State University. Of course the object was to attract more minorities to a lily white academic institution. And though it might have worked I think we still had a problem of keeping minorities there once we got them there.
But I appreciated this particular idea and have tried to practice it myself and it is this: The discomfort shown by some White people on the street when they encounter a minority may not be conscious but it is clearly displayed with averted eyes, harshness of voice, and avoidance. Therefore the opposite--EYE CONTACT, A SMILE, AND A HELLO work to counteract the previous negative experiences that negate the person's sense of worth. Because of the negative repercussions of being ignored or avoided throughout their life, what seems to us to be a small gesture has a much bigger positive effect than we might think.
It was also suggested that when speaking with a minority individual that we consciously smile more and speak more gently than we would with our friends and acquaintances. This needs to be done to counterbalance our unawareness of the harshness we may be using in the first place.
Thanks again for the great talk and for making it available on line through your friend.
Yikes - I don't think I ever saw this comment two years ago! I am so sorry! Yes, your additional suggestion is extremely important. Social inequality works on multiple levels, and interpersonal interaction is an important one. Your comments do suggest some very concrete ways we can push back against interactional racism, so thank you!
Delete